|

DLC designs, manufactures and supplies lighting control products,
ranging from basic components to integrated systems.
Since
1962, DLC has developed many lighting control firsts for the North
American and International lighting control markets.
For
more information on Douglas products and services, visit our DLC
Website or contact
us.
|

|
There
are many ways to integrate a BMS with Lighting Controls. For
many years simple contact closure outputs connected to inputs
in the lighting control panels were all that was required
to give building managers control of their lights from the
BMS console. This method has stood the test of time because
it was simple to understand and easy to maintain.
In
recent years, the need for more sophistication in the interaction
of the lighting control and HVAC systems has caused the need
for network protocols of both systems to communicate.

|
|
The two protocol standards ASHRAE has adopted are Bacnet
and LonWorks. Both of these are widely used
throughout the building controls industry. The question that
arises is "What is the best way to integrate-
gateway or native?"
A
Gateway connects two stand alone systems
that can have the same or different protocols, while a Native
approach must be integrated as one system. Each way has its
advantages and what follows will compare some of these from
a lighting control perspective.

|

|
Gateway.
-
Lighting Controls are stand alone and can communicate only
through the gateway. Commissioning is done by the lighting
controls supplier.
- Requires
two data bases.
- Functionality
is determined by the lighting control system.
- Lighting
control system support and maintenance is usually provided
by the building owner.
|
|
Native.
-
Every relay panel within the lighting control system has
a network node.
Commissioning is done by the system integrator.
- Requires
only one data base.
- Functionality
is determined by the system integrator.
- System
support and maintenance is usually provided by the system
integrator.
|

|
Advantages
of Gateway.
-
Requires less integration time since the lighting control
system will already be functioning as a stand alone entity.
- Simplifies
system integrator tasks as there is only one device to integrate.
- Requires
less commissioning time since lighting control systems have
built in configuration and programming tools that speed
up the process and can even be programmed before shipment.
- Functionality
is determined by the lighting control supplier so the latest
advancements in technology such as daylight harvesting can
be implemented effectively.
|
|
Advantages
of Native.
-
Only one user interface for both HVAC and Lighting for the
building staff to learn.
- Only
one supplier is responsible for both HVAC and Lighting Control
maintenance.
- System
integrator is in control of obsolescence.
- All
lighting control network variables are available to the
integrator to use at their discretion.
- It
is possible to specify either Bacnet or
LonWorks open protocols and require the
respective association standards certifications to be adhered
to. This will define for the System Integrator what they
have to allow for at bid time.
|
| Douglas
Lighting Controls has an array of products designed specifically
for integrators and has integration specialists on staff to
assist in design, integration and programming of systems.
Go to Integration
Products on the Douglas Website for more information on
Douglas System Integration Products. |

Our
goal is to inform, not annoy.
If you wish to not receive these newsletters, please select this
unsubscribe link.
|